I could not believe I was sitting three feet from a Nobel Prize Winner as he described the nitty gritty details of his writing “process”. I had seen him the night before in a sold-out lecture hall, but this was a Master Class for Prose Fiction writers.
Mr. Ishiguro received his Masters in Creative Writing at UEA in 1980. There were only 6 people in his class. His friends here at UEA call him “Ish”. He will be 63 next month. He is extremely humble and down-to-earth.
There is no way that I can do justice to his words. But I promised my writer friends that I would try to pass on the most salient gems of his writerly advice. So I will try. I did not record either of his talks, so his words are not verbatim. They are a combination of my notes and my memory. If I have somehow misinterpreted his meaning, it has been inadvertent, and I apologise.
Please also forgive the scattered nature of the ideas. I decided it was better to go ahead and post something than nothing! I’ve got to get back to my own writing!
Genre
“We should have a think about genre.” He told a story from Neil Gaiman: A bookshop suddenly decided to get rid of the shelves of “horror” or was it “SciFi”? Anyway, somebody had to reshelve all those books into other genres. His point was that the boundaries of genre are very fluid and they are simply an invented category for the sake of marketing, for publishers and booksellers. Writers should not succumb to those artificial borderlines when they are writing.
Character
He used to think of characters as individuals. Late in his writing career, he decided he should not worry about characters in isolation. Now he tries to answer the character questions through the character’s relationship to others. Does the relationship have a beginning, middle, end? What drives stories are human relationships. Never Let Me Go is centered around a triangular relationship.
He quoted somebody who said: “A 3D character is someone who surprises you convincingly.”
Revision Process
He said every person in the room was a better prose writer than he was. He says his genius is in “between the drafts”, during the the revision of drafts.
He has still not settled on one method. In Remains of the Day, he wrote 30-40 pages and revised them furiously until they were finished. Then he would move on. In Never Let Me Go, he wrote the whole first draft from beginning to end. He said he thought he did this out of fear—that he would not be able to sustain the story if he stopped to revise.
“My superpower is between drafts. I am not afraid to deconstruct and start from scratch.”
Nobody sees his first draft. Not even his wife. That is a private place where he is absolutely free to do whatever he wants and make whatever mistakes he makes. He handwrites it because he feels safer in handwriting. Nobody can read it. It is an extremely private document.
In writing his second novel, he had a bad experience. He went very far into a draft with the wrong narrator, a child. So he had to start all over. Audition your narrators. Write several pages using different narrators and see which one offers the most possibility.
Readers
Only his wife and his agent are his readers. Be careful who you give your work to. You must trust their taste. Don’t listen to a bunch of disparate opinions. It could dilute your vision.
His wife is his best and most trusted reader. She is not afraid to tell him the truth. At one point after The Remains of the Day, when he was writing something else, she said to him: “You are still in the mind of a butler.”
Writerly Instinct (comparisons to Jazz)
Why is one take of music better than another? They are the exact same piece of music played by the same person. But one just sounds a lot better, there is no intellectual reason for it. There is no justification. You just feel it. You have to hone this instinct, to know which draft or passage is better than another.
Why is one performance of jazz music better than another? Intentionality. This applies to all art. Intentionality. That’s what makes the difference between a jazz performance that is just a show of technique versus one that really moves the audience. When a performer has intentionality, he is there to say something with his riffs, using his skills to say something new. The artist needs to convey something personally important, something that really matters to him to say. And you can feel that.
His themes and books
Usually he picks the theme/idea and then he tries to figure out which characters and what setting would be the best place to explore that idea. He only picked setting first once (A Pale View of Hills) because he wanted to explore his memories of Japan.
He feels that this first book, set in Japan, is too mysterious. A lot of people accepted it, thinking it “must be a Japanese thing.” Today, he wouldn’t make it as mysterious. Ambiguity is a powerful tool, but bafflement is not what you’re after.
Melancholy: He likes to write about humans looking back at their lives and coming to terms with the good things, the bad things, the unfulfilled things. He likes to write about characters who can’t quite articulate how their lives have been thwarted.
Memory: He likes the freedom of using memory as an organising principle—you can juxtapose a memory from 30 years ago with something that happened two days ago.
The Buried Giant: Nations (like individuals) have a memory. What do nations (individuals) choose to forget in order to move on and what do they choose to remember and keep as part of their history? How do people (nations) lie to themselves?
Never Let Me Go: It’s remarkable how humans love each other in the worst of scenarios.
Remains of the Day: the tension comes from suppression of emotion. You know the bomb is going to go off, you just don’t know when and how. It wasn’t until a very late draft in which he wrote the scene where the butler breaks down.
The ending
How much of your story do you know before you start story?
Planning has advantages: you can control reader manipulation. But serendipitous discoveries come from improvised moments, this is when dark things come stumbling out. So try to have both.
David Mitchell doesn’t like to know the ending. Ishiguro needs to know where the story is going to lead.
When he was young
He used to worry about “voice”, about somebody being able to pick up a book and know that it was him, that it was recognisably his voice. Don’t waste too much time on that. Your voice is naturally unique. It’s dangerous if it becomes a conscious choice.
Who do you like to read?
“I don’t read that much fiction.” (He’s obsessed with graphic novels at the moment. He also writes song lyrics for Stacey Kent.)
“I like writers who teach me something about writing: Haruki Murakami, David Mitchell, Cormac McCarthy, García Márquez.”
“We used to have Dictatorship Envy, because those writers under dictators had something to write about. We were relatively comfortable in a stable, liberal democracy. It was harder to figure out what to write about. That’s when I discovered García Márquez and Magical Realism.”
Reading tastes are equivalent to racism. If you say you don’t read horror, or SciFi, you are being ‘racist’ toward a genre. Don’t do that.
Gossip
Neil Gaiman (SciFi in China): The Chinese used to ban SciFi because it was used a Trojan Horse to bring in anti-government, anti-Communist ideas. But today, the Chinese leaders have realised that they are not as successful in video gaming because they have limited the imaginations of their children with no SciFi. So they invited Gaiman and other Sci Fi writers to a conference in China to talk about Science Fiction.
James Ivory said, “Anthony Hopkins doesn’t cry very well. I don’t want the final emotional scene in the movie.” (It’s in the DVD extras.)
Advice
You should limit production of your work. Don’t be free and easy giving out your energy. Only do it when it really matters. You’ll lose yourself.
What are the emotions you want to express?
What is the fictional world of your story in relation to the world? What are its behavioural laws, its laws of physics? What is the literary world that the character inhabits?
What do you select to include in a scene/conversation? Think about the graphic novel: a story told through static images. There can be no motion like there is in film. The images reflect the exact moment something is happening. Don’t pick the obvious key turning points. Let the reader guess.
Limitations of vision are useful.
Take drafting seriously.
Hone your instinct.
Be courageous. Don’t just write what you know.
